Joe Rogan didn’t hold back
Joe Rogan Delivers Some Tough Words For Gavin Newsom
Joe Rogan didn’t hold back when discussing California Governor Gavin Newsom’s rumored presidential ambitions, saying the Democratic leader has no business running for the White House after what he called a disastrous record governing his state.
Speaking on “The Joe Rogan Experience,” Rogan said, “You can’t ruin a city and then a state and then say, ‘Guys, that was just practice. When I get elected President, I’ll fix it all.’”
His remarks, which drew widespread attention online, echoed frustrations many Californians have voiced over homelessness, rising crime, and the state’s high cost of living.
The comments came during a discussion about the state of American politics and whether Democratic leadership at the state level had produced results worthy of national office.
Rogan’s blunt criticism resonated with many conservatives who view California as an example of failed progressive governance.
Fox News reported that Rogan, who left California for Texas in 2020, has repeatedly cited the state’s high taxes and increasing crime as key reasons for his move. He told listeners, “California used to be the place everyone wanted to go. Now, everyone’s leaving.”
Rogan said that under Newsom’s leadership, major cities like Los Angeles and San Francisco have suffered record homelessness, declining public safety, and worsening drug problems.
“It’s heartbreaking,” Rogan added. “They’ve got every resource imaginable, but the leadership is clueless.”
The Hill noted that Newsom’s name continues to circulate in Democratic circles as a potential 2028 presidential contender, especially as President Trump seeks reelection.
Newsom has denied he’s planning a run but has kept a national profile through appearances on cable news and foreign visits.
Rogan dismissed those efforts, calling them “image management.” He argued that voters should judge results, not speeches. “You can’t just go around the country telling people you’ll fix what you couldn’t fix at home,” he said.
Critics of Newsom point to the state’s population loss in recent years as a sign of deeper problems.
Census data shows California lost more than half a million residents between 2020 and 2023, with many citing affordability and safety as reasons for leaving.
BOMBSHELL: CIA Director Ratcliffe Releases Newly Declassified Documents Revealing Joe Biden…
BOMBSHELL: CIA Director Ratcliffe Releases Newly Declassified Documents Revealing Joe Biden…
The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) has declassified a 2015 intelligence report revealing that then-Vice President Joe Biden requested the agency not to disseminate a document detailing Ukrainian officials’ concerns about his family’s alleged corrupt business dealings in Ukraine.
The report, dated December 2015 and created in 2016, captured Ukrainian officials’ frustration over Biden’s visit to Kyiv, where they expected discussions on personnel matters but received only a generic public speech.
CIA Director John Ratcliffe declassified the heavily redacted records, stating that this was an example of “politicization of intelligence.” A senior CIA official confirmed that Biden’s request was granted, and the intelligence report was not disseminated outside the CIA.
The official noted that it was “extremely rare and unusual” for the White House to inquire about the dissemination of a particular report for what appeared to be political reasons.
The declassified documents have reignited scrutiny over Biden’s actions as Vice President and raised questions about the extent to which political considerations influenced intelligence operations during that period.
Republican lawmakers have seized upon the declassified documents, alleging that Biden’s aides suppressed information about his family’s business ties in Ukraine to protect his political interests.
James Comer, a Republican lawmaker, claimed that the newly declassified CIA documents back GOP allegations of suppression of Biden family business ties in Ukraine.
This revelation adds to a growing body of evidence suggesting that intelligence agencies may have been used to shield the Biden family from scrutiny during the Obama administration.
The full implications of this declassified document remain to be seen, but it underscores the ongoing scrutiny of the Biden family’s foreign business dealings and the role of intelligence agencies in addressing potential conflicts of interest.
The declassification of this report has prompted calls for further investigation into the actions of the Biden administration and its handling of intelligence information.
Critics argue that the suppression of such information undermines public trust in government institutions and raises concerns about accountability and transparency.
The debate over the declassification of this report highlights the broader issue of executive power and the balance between transparency and oversight.
It raises important questions about the role of intelligence agencies in informing public discourse and the extent to which political considerations should influence the dissemination of sensitive information.
As the controversy continues to unfold, lawmakers and the public await further developments and potential investigations into the actions of the Biden administration and its handling of intelligence information related to Ukraine.
The declassification of this report serves as a reminder of the complex and often contentious relationship between politics and intelligence, and the challenges inherent in ensuring that sensitive information is handled appropriately and in the public interest.
In the coming weeks, it is expected that congressional committees will hold hearings to examine the circumstances surrounding the suppression of this intelligence report and to assess the implications for U.S. foreign policy and national security.
The outcome of these investigations could have significant ramifications for the Biden administration and its legacy, as well as for public trust in government institutions and the integrity of the intelligence community.
As the story develops, it will be important to monitor the responses of key stakeholders, including lawmakers and intelligence officials, to gauge the broader impact of this declassification on U.S. politics and governance.
The declassification of this report also underscores the importance of oversight and accountability in the intelligence community, and the need for mechanisms to ensure that sensitive information is handled responsibly and in accordance with the law.
Moving forward, it will be crucial to assess the lessons learned from this episode and to consider reforms that can strengthen the integrity and transparency of intelligence operations.
This declassification brings to light the urgent need for reform in how intelligence is protected from political interference.
Lawmakers are expected to demand greater transparency and safeguards to prevent future suppression of critical intelligence for political purposes.
The revelations further confirm concerns about the politicization of intelligence agencies during the Obama-Biden era.
Republicans and conservative commentators argue that this episode demonstrates a clear abuse of executive authority to shield political allies.
The CIA documents highlight how the suppression of intelligence can undermine national security and the credibility of U.S. foreign policy.
The declassified report has reinvigorated calls for accountability and thorough investigations into the Biden family’s dealings abroad.
